Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly large language models (LLMs), enabled an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image synthetic intelligence image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu as well as various smaller sized firms have established generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes throughout a large range of industries, including software development, health care, finance, home entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] fashion, [18] and product design. [19] However, concerns have actually been raised about the prospective abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, the use of fake news or deepfakes to trick or control people, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Intellectual property law concerns likewise exist around generative models that are trained on and imitate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its creation, researchers in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the consequences of producing artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have actually previously been explored by misconception, fiction and approach because antiquity. [23] The idea of automated art dates back at least to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where creators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were explained as having actually created machines capable of composing text, creating sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of creative automations has grown throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s robot created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been used to design natural languages considering that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his very first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the novel Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is discovered on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The academic discipline of expert system was established at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced several waves of development and optimism in the years because. [31] Artificial Intelligence research started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have utilized expert system to develop artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and displaying generative AI works created by AARON, the computer program Cohen created to generate paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative planning were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI preparing systems, particularly computer-aided process preparation, utilized to produce series of actions to reach a specified goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems utilized symbolic AI methods such as state space search and restriction satisfaction and were a « relatively mature » innovation by the early 1990s. They were utilized to create crisis action strategies for military usage, [35] process prepare for making [33] and decision strategies such as in prototype self-governing spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural nets (2014-2019)

Since its beginning, the field of device learning used both discriminative models and generative designs, to model and forecast data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep learning drove development and research study in image category, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this age were normally trained as discriminative designs, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, developments such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks efficient in finding out generative models, as opposed to discriminative ones, for complicated information such as images. These deep generative designs were the very first to output not only class labels for images but likewise whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network enabled developments in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] resulting in the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), understood as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the capability to generalize unsupervised to numerous various tasks as a Structure model. [40]

The brand-new generative models presented during this duration enabled big neural networks to be trained using without supervision learning or semi-supervised knowing, rather than the supervised learning normal of discriminative models. Unsupervised learning eliminated the requirement for humans to manually identify information, allowing for larger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, created by a confidential MIT researcher, was a totally free web application that might create persuading character voices using very little training data. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, affecting subsequent developments in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the development of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which even more democratized access to premium expert system art creation from natural language triggers. [46] These systems showed extraordinary capabilities in generating photorealistic images, artwork, and develops based on text descriptions, causing extensive adoption among artists, designers, and the public.

In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT changed the ease of access and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to take part in natural conversations, generate innovative material, assist with coding, and carry out different analytical tasks recorded global attention and triggered prevalent conversation about AI’s potential influence on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another dive in generative AI abilities. A team from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it « might fairly be seen as an early (yet still insufficient) version of an artificial basic intelligence (AGI) system. » [49] However, this assessment was objected to by other scholars who kept that generative AI remained « still far from reaching the standard of ‘basic human intelligence' » as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI design integrating several modalities including text, images, video, thermal data, 3D information, audio, and motion, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI model available in four variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and announced plans for « Bard Advanced » powered by the bigger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google merged Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, releasing a mobile app on Android and integrating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 household of big language designs, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs demonstrated significant improvements in capabilities across numerous standards, with Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforming leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed enhanced performance compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, especially in areas such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has emerged as a worldwide leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents utilizing the innovation, going beyond both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is more evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, considerably exceeding the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by using without supervision artificial intelligence (invoking for circumstances neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised device discovering trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend upon the modality or type of the data set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For instance, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language designs). They are capable of natural language processing, device translation, and natural language generation and can be used as structure designs for other jobs. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language models can be trained on shows language text, permitting them to produce source code for new computer programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing premium visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can also be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, released in March 2020, which showed the capability to clone character voices utilizing as low as 15 seconds of training information. [67] The site gained prevalent attention for its ability to generate emotionally expressive speech for different fictional characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives consequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of recorded music together with text annotations, in order to generate new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a soothing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been created, like the song Savages, which utilized AI to imitate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t secured from regenerative AI yet, raising an argument about whether artists ought to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been developed that can be generated utilizing a text expression, genre alternatives, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can create temporally-coherent, in-depth and photorealistic video clips. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can likewise be trained on the motions of a robotic system to generate new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research uses prompts like « pick up blue bowl » or « wipe plate with yellow sponge » to control motions of a robot arm. [78] Multimodal « vision-language-action » designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out fundamental thinking in action to user triggers and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when provided the timely choice up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially intelligent computer-aided style (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could likewise be established utilizing connected open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to help simplify workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have been integrated into a variety of existing commercially offered items such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are also readily available as open-source software application, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.

Smaller generative AI designs with approximately a few billion criteria can work on mobile phones, embedded gadgets, and individual computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion parameters) can work on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger designs with tens of billions of parameters can work on laptop computer or desktop computer systems. To attain an appropriate speed, models of this size may need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon products. For instance, the 65 billion parameter version of LLaMA can be set up to operate on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI in your area consist of defense of personal privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific focuses on utilizing consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such strategies as compression. That online forum is among only two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design criteria. [93] Yann LeCun has actually advocated open-source models for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI safety. [95]

Language designs with hundreds of billions of specifications, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, normally work on datacenter computers equipped with arrays of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These very big models are generally accessed as cloud services online.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed constraints on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to fulfill the requirements of the sanctions.

There is complimentary software on the market efficient in recognizing text produced by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), along with images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for finding generative AI material consist of digital watermarking, content authentication, info retrieval, and maker knowing classifier designs. [100] Despite claims of accuracy, both free and paid AI text detectors have actually often produced incorrect positives, wrongly accusing students of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and guideline

In the United States, a group of business consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary contract with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to need all US business to report details to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act includes requirements to reveal copyrighted product used to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China regulates any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark generated images or videos, regulations on training information and label quality, restrictions on individual data collection, and a guideline that generative AI need to « follow socialist core values ». [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted material

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, publicly offered datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have actually argued that such training is safeguarded under fair use, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair usage training have actually argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works available to the general public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can develop nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs complete with the content they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, a number of claims connected to making use of copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has actually sued Stability AI over the usage of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York Times have sued Microsoft and OpenAI over using their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A different concern is whether AI-generated works can get approved for copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by artificial intelligence with no human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they lack human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has likewise begun taking public input to figure out if these guidelines require to be refined for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The advancement of generative AI has actually raised concerns from governments, services, and people, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, calls to pause AI experiments, and actions by several federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned « Generative AI has huge potential for excellent and wicked at scale », that AI may « turbocharge international advancement » and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, however that its destructive usage « might trigger horrific levels of death and destruction, prevalent injury, and deep mental damage on an unthinkable scale ». [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA developer Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computer systems really need to be done by them, given the difference in between computer systems and people, and in between quantitative calculations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has resulted in 70% of the tasks for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor disputes. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that « expert system postures an existential threat to imaginative professions » during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been viewed as a possible obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and work concerns among underrepresented groups internationally stays an important element. While AI assures performance enhancements and skill acquisition, concerns about task displacement and prejudiced recruiting procedures persist amongst these groups, as detailed in studies by Fast Company. To leverage AI for a more fair society, proactive actions encompass mitigating predispositions, promoting transparency, respecting privacy and permission, and welcoming varied groups and ethical factors to consider. Strategies include redirecting policy focus on regulation, inclusive style, and education’s potential for tailored mentor to make the most of benefits while reducing damages. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI designs can reflect and enhance any cultural bias present in the underlying information. For example, a language model might presume that doctors and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions are typical in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text « an image of a CEO » might disproportionately produce images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased information set. A number of methods for mitigating bias have actually been attempted, such as altering input triggers [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of « deep learning » and « fake » [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and replace them with someone else’s likeness utilizing artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have garnered prevalent attention and issues for their uses in deepfake star adult videos, vengeance pornography, phony news, scams, health disinformation, monetary scams, and hidden foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has generated actions from both industry and federal government to discover and limit their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically found that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed journal technology) to promote « transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and use ». [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to create controversial statements in the vocal style of celebs, public authorities, and other popular individuals have raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, business such as ElevenLabs have mentioned that they would deal with mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The very same software utilized to clone voices has actually been used on popular musicians’ voices to produce tunes that simulate their voices, getting both significant popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar strategies have likewise been used to develop enhanced quality or full-length versions of tunes that have actually been dripped or have yet to be launched. [155]

Generative AI has actually likewise been used to develop new digital artist personalities, with some of these receiving enough attention to receive record deals at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have likewise faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, including reaction for « dehumanizing » an artform, and also producing artists which develop impractical or immoral attract their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI‘s capability to develop sensible phony material has been exploited in various types of cybercrime, consisting of phishing scams. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been used to create disinformation and fraud. In 2020, previous Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that as soon as deepfake videos end up being completely sensible, they would stop appearing amazing to viewers, possibly leading to uncritical approval of incorrect info. [159] Additionally, large language models and other types of text-generation AI have been used to produce fake reviews of e-commerce sites to improve scores. [160] Cybercriminals have created big language models focused on fraud, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be vulnerable to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, allowing aggressors to obtain assist with damaging demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have actually shown that open-source designs can be fine-tuned to remove their safety limitations at low expense. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI models requires an enormous quantity of computing power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the monetary resources to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up purchasing access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and reporters have actually revealed issues about the environmental effect that the development and implementation of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large amounts of freshwater used for data centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical energy usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise issue that these effects may increase as these designs are incorporated into commonly utilized online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as models require to be retrained. [170]

Proposed mitigation strategies consist of factoring potential ecological expenses prior to model development or information collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of information centers to reduce electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] building more efficient device learning designs, [168] [166] [169] lessening the variety of times that models need to be retrained, [167] establishing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological impact of these designs, [168] [167] managing for openness of these designs, [167] regulating their energy and water use, [168] motivating researchers to release information on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject experts who understand both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times defines slop as comparable to spam: « inferior or undesirable A.I. material in social networks, art, books and … in search results page. » [172] Journalists have expressed issues about the scale of low-quality created content with regard to social networks material small amounts, [173] the monetary rewards from social media companies to spread such content, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research paper submissions, [175] increased time and effort to discover greater quality or wanted material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of produced material by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper released by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a picture of web pages, were maker translated. A number of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, especially for sentences that were translated across a minimum of three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that calculated word frequencies based upon text from the Internet, revealed that she had actually stopped updating the information for several reasons: high costs for obtaining data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive focus on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing community, and that « generative AI has contaminated the data ». [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools caused an explosion of AI-generated content throughout numerous domains. A research study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were likely written with LLM assistance. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, roughly 17.5% of freshly published computer science documents and 16.9% of peer review text now include content generated by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a similar trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that an average of 34 million images have actually been developed daily. As of August 2023, more than 15 billion images had actually been created using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these developed by designs based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated material is included in brand-new data crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI models, problems in the resulting models may take place. [185] Training an AI design solely on the output of another AI model produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each brand-new design is trained on the previous design’s output, leads to progressive degradation and ultimately leads to a « model collapse » after several iterations. [186] Tests have been conducted with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the value of data gathered from real human interactions with systems might end up being significantly important in the presence of LLM-generated material in data crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, synthetic data is frequently used as an alternative to data produced by real-world occasions. Such information can be deployed to validate mathematical models and to train artificial intelligence designs while preserving user personal privacy, [188] including for structured data. [189] The approach is not restricted to text generation; image generation has been utilized to train computer system vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been using an undisclosed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET posted corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a phony AI-generated interview with previous racing driver Michael Schumacher, who had actually not made any public appearances given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding accident. The story included 2 possible disclosures: the cover included the line « deceptively genuine », and the interview consisted of a recommendation at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired shortly thereafter amid the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have released short articles whose material and/or byline have actually been validated or believed to be created by generative AI models – often with incorrect material, mistakes, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually utilized generative AI to produce short articles for a number of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to show that they « had produced tens of thousands of articles for more than 150 publishers. » [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based on Generative AI models, triggering issues about task losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has actually traditionally been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material developers or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically produced anchors have likewise been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google reportedly pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to « produce newspaper article » based upon input data offered, such as « information of present occasions ». Some news business executives who viewed the pitch described it as » [taking] for granted the effort that went into producing precise and artful news stories. » [224]

In February 2024, Google introduced a program to pay little publishers to compose three articles daily utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not need the understanding or permission of the sites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it need the released posts to be labeled as being produced or helped by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually undergone cybersquatting, with articles developed by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have revealed concern that generative AI might have a damaging influence on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for try out generative AI, with Axios noting the possibility of generative AI companies producing a dependence for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which summarizes news stories, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly further decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In reaction to possible pitfalls around the use and abuse of generative AI in journalism and stress over decreasing audience trust, outlets all over the world, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually published guidelines around how they prepare to use and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uncomfortable with news produced by « primarily AI with some human oversight », and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by « generally human with some assistance from AI ». The results of global studies reported that individuals were more uncomfortable with news subjects including politics (46%), criminal offense (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer shows website

Technology website

Artificial basic intelligence – Kind of AI with extensive capabilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media developed with AI
Artificial life – Field of research study
Chatbot – Program that replicates conversation
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of large language design
Large language design – Type of artificial intelligence design
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to produce music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is produced algorithmically as opposed to manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of info retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term used in artificial intelligence

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). « Executive Order N-12-23 » (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). « Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework ». arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ « What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI? ». McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ « What is generative AI? ». IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). « Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained ». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). « Generative models ». OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). « Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding ». The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). « A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings ». Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). « OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race ». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). « LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications ». arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). « A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze ». The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). « OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ « The race of the AI laboratories warms up ». The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). « Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, companies, and governments ». Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ « Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse right now ». The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). « In Hollywood authors’ battle against AI, humans win (in the meantime) ». AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. « Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion ». Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ « How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity ». Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). « Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI ». techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). « Misinformation refilled? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown ». Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ « New AI systems collide with copyright law ». BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, recovered October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), « The Automata in the Byzantine « Throne of Solomon » », Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). « Maillardet’s Automaton ». The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). « First Links in the Markov Chain ». American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). « The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications ». Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Expert System. New York, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). « A Quick History of Generative AI » (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). « Computer helped process planning: the state-of-the-art study ». The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). « Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft ». IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI coordinator based upon the HSTS planning framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control element is a conventional spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We likewise include an architectural component clearly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). « A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT ». arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ « finetune-transformer-lm ». GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). « Language models are not being watched multitask students » (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). « Improving language comprehending with not being watched learning ». OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). « Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning ». Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). « 15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon ». The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). « Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost? ». Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some form since ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). « OpenAI’s DALL-E produces plausible images of actually anything you ask it to ». TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ « Stable Diffusion Public Release ». Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). « What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change human beings? ». The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). « How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an « anything tool » ». Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). « Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4 ». arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). « ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research and Science ». Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ « Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that combines six kinds of data ». May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). « Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI ». The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). « Google introduces Gemini-a powerful AI design it says can go beyond GPT-4 ». Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). « Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant ». The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ « Introducing the next generation of Claude ». Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). « Anthropic reveals Claude 3, exceeding GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests ». Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). « Anthropic has a quick new AI model – and a smart new way to engage with chatbots ». The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). « China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey programs ». Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ « A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4 ». March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ « Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT? ». Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). « Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.' ». The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). « On the chances and threats of structure designs ». arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). « Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code ». arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ « Purchasing Cursor ». Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex « Sandy »; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). « Art and the science of generative AI ». Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). « Zero-shot text-to-image generation ». International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). « Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence ». Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). « 15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon ». The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). « Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App ». Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). « ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる » [Game Character Voice Reading Software « 15. ai » Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another major function of 15. ai is its abundant emotional expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). « A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless ». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). « MusicLM: Generating Music From Text ». arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). « Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 « high-quality » licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s scientists laid out in a paper the ethical difficulties that they experienced around the advancement of generative AI designs like MusicGen ». Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023.
^ « Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer sparks dispute over AI rights ». Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ « 10 « Best » AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI ». October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). « Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology ». The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). « Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text ». cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). « UniPi: Learning universal policies by means of text-guided video generation ». Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). « RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control ». arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). « 10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators ». eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ « Slash CAD model build times with brand-new AI-driven part creation methodology|GlobalSpec ». Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ « The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry ». March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). « GitHub has a vision to make code more secure by style ». Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). « Text-to-video AI inches better as startup Runway reveals brand-new model ». The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is primary. Runway states it’ll be making its brand-new generative video model, Gen-2, offered to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). « Microsoft includes OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel ». CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative synthetic intelligence technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of organization software application … the brand-new A.I. features, called Copilot, will be readily available in a few of the business’s most popular organization apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). « The app’s Memories feature simply got a huge upgrade ». TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll have the ability to utilize generative AI to come up with some suggested names like « a desert adventure ».
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). « Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop ». MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) will end up being one of the most important features for creative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). « LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and use Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot today ». VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 on your own machine or modify the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). « How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4 ». Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can produce a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). «  »Draw Things » App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone ». The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are generated locally, so you don’t need an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). « Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD) ». Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design at home, you will require a computer system build with a powerful GPU that can deal with the big quantity of data and calculation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). « Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot ». Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). « I practically only trust two LLM evals right now » (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). « Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs … » (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). « Open source platforms * increase * safety and security » (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). « U.S. authorities order Nvidia to stop sales of leading AI chips to China ». Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). « Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed ». Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while abiding by strict U.S. export requirements that limit just how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). « How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions ». Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ « 5 complimentary software application to recognise fake AI-generated images » (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ « Detecting AI finger prints: A guide to watermarking and beyond ». Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). « We checked a new ChatGPT-detector for instructors. It flagged an innocent trainee ». washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). « Detecting AI might be difficult. That’s a big issue for teachers ». washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). « OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI content for safety, White House states ». Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ « FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System ». The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). « 3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI ». Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ « EU AI Act: very first guideline on expert system ». European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). « EU lawmakers choose harder AI rules as draft relocate to last ». Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). « China states generative AI rules to use only to products for the public ». Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ « 生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 ». July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b « Generative Expert system and Copyright Law ». Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). « We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image ». The New York Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). « The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots ». Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). « Photo huge Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise accepting the innovation ». AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). « The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started ». Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). « New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement ». Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). « AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court states ». Reuters. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). « US Copyright Office desires to hear what people think of AI and copyright ». The Verge. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ « Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence ». un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ « The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI ». Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). « Lessons from Eliza ». The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). « AI is already taking computer game illustrators’ jobs in China ». Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). « China’s game art industry supposedly decimated by growing AI utilize ». Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). « Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of sophisticated tech ». NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding a contract that explicitly requires AI regulations to secure writers and the works they develop. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be used to change labor-has end up being a crucial sticking point for stars going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more typically called SAG-AFTRA), stated that ‘expert system poses an existential danger to imaginative professions, and all stars and performers deserve agreement language that protects them from having their identity and talent exploited without authorization and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). « ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools launch out of beta ». TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. « ‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods ». Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). « Underrepresented groups in countries all over the world are stressed over AI being a hazard to jobs ». Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). « Large language designs are prejudiced. Can logic assist in saving them? ». MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). « Reducing bias and improving security in DALL · E 2 ». OpenAI. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). « No quick fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 showed the obstacles of predisposition in AI ». NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ « DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations ». OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). « Terrifying state-of-the-art porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the increase ». Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). « We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now ». Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ « What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying ». Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ « Experts fear face switching tech might begin a global face-off ». The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). « Here Come the Fake Videos, Too ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). « Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting ». arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). « Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance ». JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). « U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election ». Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). « Russia, Iran use AI to increase anti-U.S. impact projects, authorities state ». The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ « Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) ». deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). « H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019 ». www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ « New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections ». Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). « Disinformation wars: The fight against phony news in the age of AI« . New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). « Navigating the difficulties of generative innovations: Proposing the combination of expert system and blockchain ». Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ « People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips ». PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ « The generative A.I. software race has actually begun ». Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). « Elections in UK and US at threat from AI-driven disinformation, say professionals ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ « Seeing is believing? Global scramble to tackle deepfakes ». news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). « 4chan users accept AI voice clone tool to generate star hatespeech ». The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). « Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I. » The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ « A new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake celebrity audio clips ». Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). « Just Because AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good ». Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). « An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World ». The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). « AI tunes that imitate popular artists raising alarms in the music market ». ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. « Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs ». Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. « Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music? ». Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). « Warner Music signs first-ever record offer with AI pop star ». New York Post. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). « Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0 ». Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. « As social media platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ forecasts the biggest threat is that deepfakes will ultimately become boring ». Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). « Fake evaluations: can we trust what we read online as usage of AI explodes? ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ « After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data ». PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). « From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy ». IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). « Should we make our most effective AI designs open source to all? ». Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). « In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends ». New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). « On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big? ». Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d « AI is an energy hog. This is what it implies for climate change ». MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). « The carbon effect of expert system ». Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). « Generative AI’s ecological expenses are skyrocketing – and mainly secret ». Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. « AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). « Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system researcher describes the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins ». The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). « Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet? ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). « First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop' ». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b « Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook ». Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). « The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop ». The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). « Research AI design suddenly attempts to customize its own code to extend runtime ». Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). « Spam, junk … slop? The current wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet' ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). « Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles ». 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop ». Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). « A Stunning Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism ». Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). « A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine ». VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). « Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data' ». 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually always been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, « it was workable and often recognizable. Large language designs create text that masquerades as genuine language with intent behind it, despite the fact that there is none, and their output emerge all over, » she composed. She gives the example that ChatGPT excessive uses the word « dive, » in a method that people do not, which has shaken off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). « ChatGPT « contamination »: approximating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature ». arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). « How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models? ». Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). « AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI ». Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). « AI models collapse when trained on recursively created information ». Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). « When A.I.’s Output Is a Risk to A.I. Itself ». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad ». ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). « Synthetic Data for Better Artificial Intelligence ». databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). « Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data ». kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). « Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion ». arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). « CNET discovered mistakes in over half of its AI-written stories ». The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ « A magazine touted Michael Schumacher’s very first interview in years. It was actually AI ». NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). « Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is « Entirely » Comprised ». Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ « NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ using AI ». Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). « Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers ». Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). « Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article ». Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). « B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person ». PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). « USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage ». Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). « Dispatch stops briefly AI sports writing program ». Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). « Mysterious bylines appeared on an USA Today site. Did these writers exist? ». Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner « Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry ». Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). « How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business ». CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). « News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional news stories a week ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). « Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Transfer To AI Content ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). « Pertaining to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories ». Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). « The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb ». Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). « Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, In Addition To Warning They May Be Filled With Errors ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). « Irish Times apologises for scam AI short article about ladies’s usage of phony tan ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). « CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). « BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ « Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom ». Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ « What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and nothing ». Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ « AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for conventional publishers? ». San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). « A nationwide network of regional news websites is publishing AI-written posts under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm ». CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ « Wyoming reporter caught using synthetic intelligence to develop fake quotes and stories ». Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated articles, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders ». ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « AI-generated posts are permeating significant news publications ». National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). « Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans ». Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « Apple states it will upgrade AI function after incorrect news notifies ». The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ « TV channels are utilizing AI-generated speakers to check out the news. The concern is, will we trust them? ». BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). « ‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). « World’s first AI news anchor unveiled in China ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ « These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is real ». Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). « Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). « Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform ». Adweek. from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). « Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). « How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). « A Beloved Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff ». 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). « Early Apple tech blog writers are stunned to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified ». The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « AI slop is already attacking Oregon’s regional journalism ». Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the original on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). « How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). « We Need Your Email Address ». 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ « Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket ». Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). « Senators alert AI could cause ‘damage’ of local news ». Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ « OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news offer ». Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). « Meta left news. Now the company’s using it for AI content ». Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ « How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools ». Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). « Standards around generative AI ». Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). « The Guardian’s technique to generative AI ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). « Policies in parallel? A relative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations ». pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). « Digital Report 2024 » (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.